维基教科书:删除方针

维基教科书,自由的教学读本
跳转至: 导航搜索
Blue question mark.svg 本页或以下篇幅是一项有關维基教科書的方针、指引或流程的提议。该提议可能仍需要进一步的完善,需要更多讨论并进一步获得社群的共识来确立。请勿在引用或者链接中把本页的描述作为一项正式的方针或指引。

維基人若要進行跟刪除有關的活動(包括請求頁面恢復),必須跟隨此守則。

只有管理員才能刪除及恢復頁面。任何用戶都可能清空一個頁面,但是頁面原來的內容還將存在於頁面的歷史中,其他人仍可以瀏覽,如果他們願意也可以恢復到以前的版本。然而當頁面被刪除時,不但會刪除當前版本,同時還會刪除以前所有的版本。恢復頁面則指把頁面內容、歷史帶回來。

通用刪除方針[编辑]

  • 在正常情況下,保留一些可被改進的小作品,但刪除一些定義太窄或沒定內容的小作品。
  • 在正常情況下,保留需要受關注的頁面,但刪除沒意義的內容。
  • 在正常情況下,刪除沒可能成為教育資源的頁面,包括古怪的主題,例如「如何教導一百隻猴子打出莎士比亞的作品」。

有意義的內容[编辑]

快捷方式
WB:NMC

如果內容不能夠提升讀者的價值或改善維基教科書的話,就不算有意義的內容。「有意義的內容」在不同的名字空間有不同的定義。在請求刪除或刪除時要小心。如有任何疑問,乾脆把它帶到刪除請求去談談。

沒意義的內容包括:

  • 廣告、破壞。
  • 測試、胡言亂語。
  • 已被遺棄的頁面,沒有真正的內容。

要是想檢查創造者是否真的想繼續發展,可以利用{{query}}模版。

快速刪除[编辑]

快捷方式
WB:SPEEDY

快速刪除指沒有反對理由的刪除請求。任何人都可以要求快速刪除,而任何人萬一有反對,都可把要求移除,並到刪除請求討論。惡意請求可被任何人移除。如要要求快速刪除,在該頁面頂部加上{{delete|原因}}即可。結果如下:


Icono aviso borrar.png
本頁需快速刪除
其原因為︰原因。

如果不同意快速刪除,可在 討論頁提出原因。如果本頁明顯不符合快速刪除的條件,或你希望修改它,請移除本通知,但不要將自己創建頁面上的通知移除。

管理员注意检查是否存在链入页面页面历史最后一次编辑),然后才能删除

該頁面會在Category:快速刪除候選出現,管理員有時間就會回應請求。

滿足下列任何一項準則的頁面就能夠快速刪除:

  1. 頁面唯一的作者自己請求
  2. 請求人自己的用戶空間裏面
  3. 不存在有意義內容的頁面;記住檢查歷史裡有沒有有意義的內容被取代。
  4. 同一本書裡面的作者達到刪除的共識。別忘記連接到該共識的討論頁。
  5. 不符合維基教科書是什麼 的頁面。有任何疑問的話,也在維基教科書:刪除請求作出討論。
  6. 不符合格式手冊的重定向頁面,或者被搜尋到的機會很少。
  7. 之前被刪除過的頁面重新發佈。

侵權[编辑]

快捷方式
WB:COPYVIO

要是有一個頁面懷疑侵犯版權,在該頁面上加上{{Copyvio|url=来源url|sign=~~~~}}:

页面正在进行版权验证
Copyright-problem.svg

本條目可能侵犯版权,並已列在Wikibooks:删除请求中。原文本疑似来自:
{{{url}}}

请暂时不要修改本頁或重复创建相同内容的页面。 并請不要在討論期間編輯此頁面或移去此標示模板,以便解決版權問題。
如希望重新编寫本条目,請在不侵犯版權的原則下,用自己的话在临时页面中發表。

注意一個非常重要的原则:尊重他人的版权,只发表在公有領域GNU自由文档许可证,或知识共享许可协议下的内容。

如何解决

  • 若您是该文本的版权持有者,请参考授权流程
  • 若您不是版权持有者,请用自己的话重写本計畫頁面。
  • 若您认为这是误报,请到此页的相应段落留言。

提示

  • 版权常见问题解答 · 何為侵犯著作權
  • 七日之后未通过验证的页面将会被删除,若存在无版权问题的临时页面则将会替换本页面。
  • 张贴没有声明版权使用许可的材料也可能侵犯版权所有者的版权。
  • 假如您对版权尚有疑問,请参见版权FAQ。關於百度百科的版权問題,請參阅这里的说明
  • 重复侵犯版权的参与者將會被临时列入怀疑者名单中而不能编辑。
  • 在投票期间,原先条目的內容仍可透過历史链接中查看。
  • 我们仍然欢迎您贡献您的原作。

提出版权验证的维基人是:(此处显示您的签名)

創造該頁面的用戶如果在七天內沒有證明自己有權利用該頁面,該頁面就會被管理員刪除。

其它請求[编辑]

若您不同意快速刪除的理由,或者您相信不符合任何快速刪除標準的作品仍然應該刪除,能在Wikibooks:删除请求與同類社群成員討論刪除。記得簽名以及準備辯解。

接著,在最上面加上{{dr}},效果會是這樣:


這會使該頁面列入Category:刪除候選

所有維基教科書用戶都可以參與討論程序。請解釋你的理由,並謹記簽名。如果你的立場改變了,請先劃掉原本的立場,才打新的立場。 如果有共識,管理員可刪除該頁面。謹記立場不是投票,而是協助討論的方式。

Discussion may be terminated early and any outcome ignored if the discussion is believed to be the result of vandalism or part of an edit war between two contributors who may not like each other. If later serious objections are raised, discussion may resume.

You should be especially sensitive to discussions about brand-new works, particularly by new contributors to Wikibooks. Unless there are obvious problems that are unlikely to be rectified, your time would be better spent mentoring new contributors and trying to help clean up new works, even if the work is currently a blatant violation of current procedures. Remember you were once a new contributor too.

If the decision is that the page should be deleted, an administrator will do so, and it will show up on the page Special:Log/delete. Either way, the section should be archived for historical reference.

管理員指引[编辑]

Here are some guidelines that those tasked with removing pages from the database can generally be expected to follow in making the decision to delete or not:

  1. As a general rule, don't delete pages you nominate for deletion if there are a number of comments in favor of keeping. Let someone else do it.
  2. Simply deleting a page does not automatically delete its talk page or any subpages. Please delete these pages too.
  3. If another solution has been found for some of these pages than deletion, leave them listed on Wikibooks:Requests for deletion for a short while, so the original poster can see why it wasn't deleted, and what did happen to it. This will prevent reposting of the same item. Alternately, leave a message on their user page explaining the verdict of the deletion process.
  4. Use common sense and respect the judgment and feelings of other Wikibooks participants.
  5. When in doubt, don't delete.
  6. Don't hesitate to turn a speedy delete into a RfD discussion. It is better to get community input on deleting a page than indiscriminate deleting on the part of admins.
  7. Where the content is such that it might usefully be moved elsewhere (for example, another wiki or that the authors might want a copy for their own records) give some time for them to do this before deleted (or alternatively email them a copy of the text).
  8. Copyright: See Wikibooks:Copyrights for deletion policy on copyright infringement (and m:Wikipedia and copyright issues and m:Avoid Copyright Paranoia for perspective).
  9. Administrators necessarily must use their best judgment, attempting to be as impartial as is possible for a fallible human, to determine when rough consensus has been reached. For example, administrators can disregard comments if they feel that there is strong evidence that they were not made in good faith. Such "bad faith" comments include those being made by sock puppets, being made anonymously, or being made using a new userid whose only edits are to the article in question and the voting on that article.

Ideally, when an admin deletes a test page or other page with no useful content, it is a good idea to put a note on the author's talk page explaining things, pointing them to the sandbox in cases of tests. Be friendly! Everyone was new once. In the case of anon IP users this is not as important as they have likely moved on or their IPs changed since that edit.

常問問題[编辑]

Module X is totally biased! What gives?
See Wikibooks:NPOV dispute. You don't need the RfD page for that.
This user should be banned.
Please take the issue up in the administrative assistance reading room.
Where'd my page go?!
Check the deletion log and head over to Wikibooks:Requests for undeletion if you believe that a page may have been deleted without proper grounds.